The APA Justice Task Force fully supports the end of the “China Initiative.” We appreciate the Department of Justice’s openness and willingness to engage, listen, and respond to community concerns.Įnding the “China Initiative” is a promising start to correct the harms caused by the initiative, apply lessons learned, and rebuild community trust and confidence that were lost in our law enforcement and judicial system.īut we emphasize that this is just a start. Thank you, Advancing Justice | AAJC, for organizing this townhall. Radio Free Asian | 歪脑: 大国夹缝中:“中国行动计划”下科学家面临的忠诚拷问 (video 16:39)Ġ SupChina: The China Initiative is dead, but its repercussions live onĨ APA Justice: Release of Report on DOJ’s Review of the “China Initiative”ĭESCRIPTION: An open forum for community members to ask a panel of experts questions about the recent announcement from the Department of Justice to end the "China Initiative." Event was not recorded.ĪPA Justice Statement Issued During The Townhall: Ends China Programĥ Radio Free Asian | WHYNOT : Caught in the Crossfire: How the China Initiative subjected scientists to loyalty tests (video 16:39) But the Aftereffects Will Be Felt for Years.ģ The Wire China: The China Initiative is Over - Now What?Ĩ Sampan: Justice Dept. ![]() 2 Sampan: Concerns Linger Over China Initiative’s FateĨ Mother Jones: The DOJ’s China Initiative Dragnet Is Over. It is imperative to start the process of healing and restoration of trust in the law enforcement and judicial system with transparency, accountability, and community engagement in moving forward.ĩ The National Law Journal: The China Initiative May Have Finally Died-Killed Not by DOJ but the Courts Harms and wounds inflicted during and prior to the "China Initiative" are deep and wide spread in the Asian American and scientific communities, especially for academics of Chinese descent. Did the review cover allegations of DOJ and FBI misconduct?.How thorough were existing prosecutions and investigations reviewed?.Will DOJ-wide implicit bias training be restarted?.What is the new supervising role for the National Security Division?.What was the scope of the “China Initiative” review?.Such a report would help to clarify, for example, the following questions: It is common for the government to produce a written report to memorialize an important review such as that done for the “China Initiative.” It usually includes the defined scope, issues examined, process and methodology used, findings, recommended changes, decisions, and plans for implementation. Olsen's speech for the communities to move forward. Release of a report on the findings of the review is critically important to ease the broad concerns that the end of “China Initiative” is just in name but does not reflect a change in fact and substance. For transparency and to ensure an accurate understanding of the changes, we request the public release of a report memorializing the findings of his review of the program that began in November 2021. ![]() Ending the “China Initiative” is a promising start to correct the harms caused by the initiative, apply lessons learned, and rebuild community trust and confidence that were lost in our law enforcement and judicial system. Olsen, calling for the release of a report on the Department of Justice's (DOJ’s) review of the “China Initiative.” In the letter, we express our support for his announcement ending the “China Initiative” on February 23, 2022, and our appreciation for his openness and willingness to engage, listen, and respond to community concerns. On March 8, 2022, APA Justice sent a letter to Assistant Attorney General Matthew G.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |